Aug 13, 2009

As a group it’s important to unite and conquer, but individually, Senator Kent Conrad teaches us it’s better to divide

Senator Conrad, who was often referred to as chart man in the Senate, was taught by Democratic Party Leaders that one of the keys to success is to choose one area and master it. The reasoning behind this is that if every Democratic member of the senate has their own set of expertise and skills, it gives them clout and guarantees that someone knows what he or she is talking about.

Conrad took this advice to heart—and to the bank. For twenty years he was the ranking Democrat on the Budget Committee. Throughout his career, he has made himself the go-to expert in the senate’s business—raising and allocating funds. Through study history, he quickly learned that the key to a country’s success was having a strong and healthy economy. And part of that equation is ensuring that runaway debts don’t threaten the success of America.

Conrad helped lead Democrats in the fight to prevent the Bush Administration from increasing the U.S. debt limit to $9 trillion and from passing a $2.8 trillion budget, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful.

According to Time Magazine, becoming an expert in budgeting came in handy. President Bush was, “pushing a plan for partially privatizing Social Security in 2005, put the hard sell on him. Bush first tried by flying with Conrad to Fargo, N.D., then, after they returned, kept the pressure on by inviting him to the White House, where he dropped hints about election-year vulnerability for red-state Democrats. But Conrad, whose honorary Sioux name translates as 'Never Turns Back,' stood firm in his opposition to the plan.” Conrad said, “I could never support something that added dramatically to the debt," Conrad says. “I told him, 'Count me out.'”

Aug 11, 2009

Report Card for the Center for Community Change: A+



The Center for Community Change fights for issues ranging from things as simple as viewing your community as, well, a community to fair immigration reform.

So, with fighting for many issues, one may wonder how they’ve managed to help ensure that almost 4.5 million children (including immigrant children) have health insurance and that 1 million children were kept out of poverty. The answer is simple. Every initiative they embark on relates back to one very common value: community. They outline how the community, whether it’s a national, global or local community, will be affected by certain issues and ask that people don’t just think about themselves, but think about the greater good.

As shown in the video above, their main goal is to get people to think about the people that surround them as their community. It may sound silly, but when you think about it, like in the Philippines, how often have you genuinely offered to help a neighbor move, without them asking for help? In America, it’s often the case that we get wrapped up in our own lives and forget about helping the people within our community, especially those that we don’t know well.

We all can agree that respect, efficiency, collaboration and kindness are all values that the majority of people can relate to—and that’s why attaching the value of community to these issues is so effective.

And for these reasons, the Center for Community Change gets a gold star.

Aug 6, 2009

Arizona G.O.P. Divided Over Budget

Original article from the New York Times:

PHOENIX — In theory, Republicans in Arizona should be the happiest Republicans in the nation. Democrats failed in their insurgent bid last November to flip the Legislature — even as Democrats in other states succeeded — and the governor’s office is now occupied by a Republican on a fluke when Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat, left town for the Obama administration.

But hard fiscal realities can put a strain on any marriage, and the new governor, Jan Brewer, is finding that life with the Legislature and a $3.4 billion budget deficit is several feathers shy of paradise.

Republican lawmakers have insulted the governor in the local news media and rejected her budget proposals, and on Tuesday some even refused to vote on her latest budget. The governor’s plan includes tax increases for shoppers, cuts in the personal income tax and the corporate tax, and sharp reductions in state spending.

At the center of the conflict is the governor’s proposalthat the state dig out of its shortfall — equal to a third of Arizona’s operating budget — with a 1 cent sales tax increase, to be put before voters on the November ballot.

This request enraged Republican lawmakers, whose leaders have been unable to reach a budget deal with Ms. Brewer. She vetoed most of the bills in an earlier budget package, saying the cuts were too injurious to the poor. (The Democratic minority in the Legislature remains disenchanted with all of the budget proposals.)

The House passed a budget largely in line with the governor’s request, but the plan has stalled in the Senate, where four crucial lawmakers have refused to go along. One of them, Senator Carolyn S. Allen of Scottsdale, said she disliked the cut in the income and corporate tax that was negotiated by her fellow Republicans in the House in exchange for the sales tax increase.

“I think the governor has made a drastic error in judgment,” Ms. Allen said in a telephone interview. “I like her, but I think she is too desperate.”

On Tuesday, Senator Pamela Gorman resigned as majority whip, saying in an e-mail message to the Senate president, Robert Burns, that the tax battle was “taking on a life of its own that is not healthy for our caucus, nor our party.”

The entire budget process has been two parts pain and one part folly, including a moment in June when lawmakers, facing a midnight deadline, tried to metaphysically halt the fiscal year by taking the clock down from the Senate wall. They are also considering mortgaging the state Capitol as well as a historically significant limestone cave system owned by the state.

Ms. Brewer’s reputation as a conservative has been damaged by her proposal to raise the sales tax, and some of her colleagues in the party, which is dominated by conservatives, have whispered about challenging her in the 2010 Republican primary.

“The economic downturn has created a very difficult scenario for any elected official who is a fiscal conservative,” Paul Senseman, Ms. Brewer’s director of communications, said in an interview.

Arizona finds itself in a worst-case scenario among states that have been hammered by the foreclosure crisis. One of the fastest-growing areas in the country for years, the state has seen its population — and needs — explode over the last decade, and development has more than helped cover the costs.

The state’s principal revenue source is its 5.5 percent sales tax (with city tax added on, the average tax is about 9 percent), followed by the personal income tax and the corporate tax. Counties and school districts collect property taxes.

With the number of new building permits plummeting, revenues from the big-ticket items associated with new homes, which had fueled much of the state’s budget in recent years, also fell.

As secretary of state, Ms. Brewer was first in line to take over when Ms. Napolitano left to become homeland security secretary in January. Ten days after her ascension, Ms. Brewer had to face her first budget crisis, and she made it clear that big cuts to schools and health care were not going to fly, and that she thought the state would need to raise the sales tax.

Thinking they could avoid a governor’s veto of their plan, which had deep cuts, by running out the clock, Republicans wrangled over the budget for the 2010 fiscal year until the last minute. But the governor vetoed most parts of the budget except those needed to keep the state running, and then called legislators back for a special summer session to clean up the rest.

Ms. Brewer has found no succor among Democrats, whom she largely edged out of budget negotiations in the spring. They, too, are upset about her proposed cut to personal and corporate taxes, which they say will wipe out almost all the money gained with a three-year sales tax increase. Democrats say they are baffled by the inability of the majority party to make a deal with the Republican governor.

“They have shown complete and total failure to govern,” said Representative Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat and the assistant leader of the party’s caucus in the House. “They have had seven months, and they can’t get this done.”

If any of this spells trouble for the Republicans, their leaders are not saying so. “That just speaks to how diverse our state party is,” said Matt Roberts, a spokesman for the Arizona Republican Party.

Photo from the original article, taken by Ross D. Franklin (Associated Press). 


Aug 5, 2009

Report Card for GLADD: A

GLADD takes its name to heart.

The issues they are fighting for are incredibly serious, and when it’s called for, they always utilize that tone. But, they also know how to have fun—which, if you’ve been in the good graces of our community, you’re well aware that we get an A in social studies :)

And for their hard work and sense of humor, they get an A, as well.

Check out their blog and you’ll see that topics range from media favorites that are a part of the LGBTQ community and news about hate crimes. It’s important to have this sense of balance because it’s more attractive to others. No matter what the issue is, no one wants to work with someone that is somber all of the time. They want to work with someone that takes what they do seriously, but at the same time can dish about Ariel and Maria, the two bisexuals on Miami Social, and (the ever fabulous and adorable) Stephen on Paris Hilton’s My New BFF.

So, all in all, if you want to Unite and Conquer, you need to be GLADD.

Aug 3, 2009

The often forgotten key to coalition success: Have fun

Of course, every coalitions goal is to create change. And it’s often not an easy task.

So, how do you ensure that people remain excited and passionate about what you’re trying to accomplish? It’s simple: Have fun.

Encourage people to have a sense of humor, find people that work hard but also have class clown tendencies, make sure the people you’re working with have a good attitude and aren’t the type to stress everyone out. It’s good to have people with type A tactics, because, after all, you do want to get some work done, but don’t leave out those with type B attitudes because they’ll help keep a positive, approachable vibe.

If it’s all work and no play, people are going to get burnt out. It sounds cliché, but try and build your coalition with people that play as hard as they work.